Getting stakeholder participation ‘right’: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls

By J. Glicken. 2000

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/884f2fe29e10703fb70fe50cfc8c4bffd795a81c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Corbera
2. K. Brown
3. C. Pahl‐Wostl
4. W. Adger
5. Matthew P. Hare
6. A. Vatn
7. Tracey Osborne
8. Elizabeth Shapiro‐Garza

In Sociology and Political Science

1. K. Brown
2. Matthew P. Hare
3. W. Adger
4. E. Corbera
5. C. Pahl‐Wostl

Citations in the corpus

• Stakeholder Categorisation in Participatory Integrated Assessment Processes (2002, methodology): “The most appropriate de®nition for this study derives from [11]: `̀ A stakeholder is an individual or group in ̄uenced by ± and with an ability to signi®cantly impact (either directly or indirectly) ± the topical area of interest.”
• The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services (2007, background): “…involving the maximum possible number of local stakeholders, particularly the most disadvantaged, and creating equal opportunities for participation whilst ensuring that no one is made worse off in the implementation of policies or the creation of markets (Dube and Swatuk, 2002; Glicken, 2000).”