Combining full-shape and BAO analyses of galaxy power spectra: a 1.6% CMB-independent constraint on H0

By O. Philcox, Mikhail Ivanov, M. Simonovi'c, M. Zaldarriaga. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2020

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present cosmological constraints from a joint analysis of the pre- and post-reconstruction galaxy power spectrum multipoles from the final data release of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS). Geometric constraints are obtained from the positions of BAO peaks in reconstructed spectra, which are analyzed in combination with the unreconstructed spectra in a full-shape (FS) likelihood using a joint covariance matrix, giving stronger parameter constraints than FS-only or BAO-only analyses. We introduce a new method for obtaining constraints from reconstructed spectra based on a correlated theoretical error, which is shown to be simple, robust, and applicable to any flavor of density-field reconstruction. Assuming ΛCDM with massive neutrinos, we analyze clustering data from two redshift bins zeff=0.38,0.61 and obtain 1.6% constraints on the Hubble constant H0, using only a single prior on the current baryon density ωb from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN) and no knowledge of the power spectrum slope ns. This gives H0 = 68.6±1.1 km s−1Mpc−1, with the inclusion of BAO data sharpening the measurement by 40%, representing one of the strongest current constraints on H0 independent of cosmic microwave background data, comparable with recent constraints using BAO data in combination with other data-sets. Restricting to the best-fit slope ns from Planck (but without additional priors on the spectral shape), we obtain a 1% H0 measurement of 67.8± 0.7 km s−1Mpc−1. Finally, we find strong constraints on the cosmological parameters from a joint analysis of the FS, BAO, and Planck data. This sets new bounds on the sum of neutrino masses ∑ mν < 0.14 eV (at 95% confidence) and the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom Neff = 2.90+0.15−0.16, though contours are not appreciably narrowed by the inclusion of BAO data.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/421d60df9ae049e3cf4eb2f5db4fa9b42cf48354

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

Citations in the corpus

TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles (2020, methodology): “…combination with baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) and Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) measurements, giving H0 = 67.4± 1.2 km s−1 Mpc−1 (Abbott et al. 2018), and using the full-shape BAO analysis in the BOSS survey in combination with BBN, giving H0 = 68.4 ± 1.1 km s−1 Mpc−1 (Philcox et al. 2020).”
The Hubble Constant from Infrared Surface Brightness Fluctuation Distances (2021, unknown): “Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in redshift surveys, which probe the scale of the primordial density fluctuations at later times, in combination with either other CMB data or constraints from big bang nucleosynthesis, imply H0≈ 67± 1 (Addison et al. 2018; Philcox et al. 2020).”
Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance (2020, methodology): “…al. (2012)) have allowed ΛCDM parameters to be precisely measured with the redshift-space galaxy power spectrum (Ivanov et al. (2019); Colas et al. (2019); D’Amico et al. (2019)), in particular, a CMBindependent 1.6% measurement of the Hubble constant H0 = 68.6±1.1 km/s/Mpc (Philcox et al. (2020)).”