A data-driven fuzzy approach for predicting the remaining useful life in dynamic failure scenarios of a nuclear system
By Enrico Zio, Francesco Di Maio. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2010
320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aerospace Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8847c2f1541ab9789531d7a3c3aba6630044716c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aerospace Engineering
In Control and Systems Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews (2015, methodology): “The data-driven approaches are generally divided into two categories: (1) the artificial intelligence approaches that include neural network (NN) [21–23] and fuzzy logic [24,25]; and (2) the statistical approaches that include the Gaussian process (GP) regression [26,27], relevance/support vector ma”
- Direct Remaining Useful Life Estimation Based on Support Vector Regression (2017, methodology): “tained by the linear regression [27]–[29], unsupervised kernel regression modeling [30], fuzzy model [31], [32], or by polygons”
- Remaining Useful Lifetime Prediction via Deep Domain Adaptation (2019, unknown): “In particular, authors have proposed several methods that attempt to extract the relationships of acquired sequential data and RUL prediction, such as linear regression [23], Support Vector Regression (SVR) [8], fuzzy-logic systems [24] and neural networks [25].”
- Multiobjective Deep Belief Networks Ensemble for Remaining Useful Life Estimation in Prognostics (2017, methodology): “sion [12], fuzzy similarity-based methods [11], [13], and Kalman filter (KF) [10], usually involves a grid search to seek”
- Potential, challenges and future directions for deep learning in prognostics and health management applications (2020, methodology): “…or design parameters of the units (e.g. average operating regimes) in order to find sub-fleets, possibly with clustering, defined by similar characteristics based on the selected parameters; subsequently using the data of each of the sub-fleets to train the algorithms (Zio and Di Maio, 2010).”