A chemical model for the atmosphere of hot Jupiters

By O. Venot, E. H'ebrard, M. Agúndez, M. Dobrijevic, F. Selsis, F. Hersant, N. Iro, R. Bounaceur. 2012

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Our purpose is to release a chemical network, and the associated rate coefficients, developed for the temperature and pressure range relevant to hot Jupiters atmospheres. Using this network, we study the vertical atmospheric composition of the two hot Jupiters (HD209458b, HD189733b) with a model that includes photolyses and vertical mixing and we produce synthetic spectra. The chemical scheme is derived from applied combustion models that have been methodically validated over a range of temperatures and pressures typical of the atmospheric layers influencing the observations of hot Jupiters. We compare the predictions obtained from this scheme with equilibrium calculations, with different schemes available in the literature that contain N-bearing species and with previously published photochemical models. Compared to other chemical schemes that were not subjected to the same systematic validation, we find significant differences whenever non-equilibrium processes take place. The deviations from the equilibrium, and thus the sensitivity to the network, are more important for HD189733b, as we assume a cooler atmosphere than for HD209458b. We found that the abundances of NH3 and HCN can vary by two orders of magnitude depending on the network, demonstrating the importance of comprehensive experimental validation. A spectral feature of NH3 at 10.5$\mu$m is sensitive to these abundance variations and thus to the chemical scheme. Due to the influence of the kinetics, we recommend the use of a validated scheme to model the chemistry of exoplanet atmospheres. Our network is robust for temperatures within 300-2500K and pressures from 10mbar up to a few hundreds of bars, for species made of C,H,O,N. It is validated for species up to 2 carbon atoms and for the main nitrogen species.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8840fb7e981a74f49b70867b2dc4ab6df6c87bb2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. N. Madhusudhan
  2. Jon Fortney
  3. V. Parmentier
  4. A. Showman
  5. M. Line
  6. Jonathan Tennyson
  7. Sergei N. Yurchenko
  8. Laura Kreidberg

In Instrumentation

  1. N. Madhusudhan
  2. Jon Fortney
  3. V. Parmentier
  4. M. Line
  5. A. Showman
  6. Laura Kreidberg
  7. Jonathan Tennyson
  8. Sergei N. Yurchenko

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Jon Fortney
  2. V. Parmentier
  3. M. Line
  4. Laura Kreidberg
  5. A. Showman
  6. Th. Henning
  7. K. Heng
  8. Y. Lian

Citations in the corpus