Estimating commuter mode choice: A discrete choice analysis of the impact of road pricing and parking charges

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

What encourages people to carpool? An evaluation of factors with meta-analysis (2017, background): “Carpooling studies tend to agree that ‘sticks’ such as extra parking charges for SOVs, are more effective motivators than ‘carrots’ such as reserved parking and partner matching services (Hwang and Giuliano 1990; Jakobsson et al. 2002).”
Commuter Mode Choice and Free Car Parking, Public Transportation Benefits, Showers/Lockers, and Bike Parking at Work: Evidence from the Washington, DC Region (2014, background): “More recently, Washbrook et al. (2006) conducted a study of the effect of road pricing and parking charges on commuter mode choice in Vancouver, Canada, and concluded that effective TDM requires a combination of disincentives for driving and incentives for walking, cycling, and public…”
Developing the ‘Service’ in Mobility as a Service: Experiences from a Field Trial of an Innovative Travel Brokerage (2016, background): “Examples include (i) economic disincentives for car use, including congestion charges, taxes and parking fees (e.g., Jakobsson et al., 2002; Washbrook et al., 2006; Börjesson et al., 2012), (ii) information campaigns and advertising to increase awareness of the effects of, and alternatives to car…”