Delegation to Supranational Institutions: Why, How, and with What Consequences?
By J. Tallberg. 2002
346 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8829d635694e780d7378b83148b5d11980b663de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Strategy and Management
- Burkard Eberlein †
- M. Thatcher
- H. Klüver
- Edgar Grande ‡
- C. Damro
- Berthold Rittberger
- D. Levi‐Faur
- M. Lodge
Citations in the corpus
- Lobbying as a collective enterprise: winners and losers of policy formulation in the European Union (2013, background): “In order to successfully fulfil its agenda-setting function, the Commission therefore aims to present proposals that gain the consent of the Council and the EP (e.g., Tallberg 2002: 34).”
- Beyond delegation: transnational regulatory regimes and the eu regulatory state (2005, background): “Why and how do member states delegate political authority to the supranational level? The most popular concept in this delegation literature is the principal–agent framework, whereby the member state principals delegate powers to supranational agents (Pollack 1997, 2003; Tallberg 2002).”
- Regulation after delegation: independent regulatory agencies in Europe (2002, background): “The empirical analysis covers national IRAs in four major countries – Britain, France, Germany and Italy (the European Community (EC) presents its own speci c issues – cf. Pollack 1997; Tallberg 2002).”