A Revised Approach to Ice Microphysical Processes for the Bulk Parameterization of Clouds and Precipitation

By Song‐You Hong, Jimy Dudhia, Shu‐Hua Chen. 2004

2,630 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87f9038cd23d30dbb19541c1c6bcec83f4987d6d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Sensitivity of a Simulated Squall Line to Horizontal Resolution and Parameterization of Microphysics (2012, positive): “The interpretation here is straightforward: the D x 5 4-km simulation is simply forced to represent convection on the smallest resolvable scale, whereas the D x 5 0.25-km Hong et al. (2004) simulations can develop a broader spectrum of convective motions, as discussed by Bryan et al. (2003).”
Tests of an Ensemble Kalman Filter for Mesoscale and Regional-Scale Data Assimilation. Part III: Comparison with 3DVAR in a Real-Data Case Study (2008, methodology): “…the physical parameterization schemes include the Grell–Devenyi cumulus scheme (Grell and Devenyi 2002), the WRF Single Moment (WSM) sixclass microphysics with graupel (Hong et al. 2004), and the Yonsei State University (YSU) scheme (Noh et al. 2003) for planetary boundary layer (PBL) processes.”
Confronting the Challenge of Modeling Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics (2020, methodology): “Aircraft observations from Houze et al. (1979) were used to characterize inverse exponential snow particle SD parameters as a function of temperature in the WSM6 scheme (WRF six‐class single moment; Hong et al., 2004; Hong & Lim, 2006).”
Dynamical downscaling of ERA-40 in complex terrain using the WRF regional climate model (2011, methodology): “The cloud microphysical scheme used was the 3-class scheme (Hong et al. 2004), the Kain–Fritsch scheme (Kain 2004) for the convective parameterization, the Yonsei University (YSU) (Hong et al. 2006) planetary boundary layer scheme, the Monin–Obukhov scheme for surface layer processes and the…”
Impact of Cloud Microphysics on the Development of Trailing Stratiform Precipitation in a Simulated Squall Line: Comparison of One- and Two-Moment Schemes (2009, background): “* Lin et al. (1983), Rutledge and Hobbs (1984), Reisner et al. (1998), and Hong et al. (2004) used a similar value of 8 3 106 m24.”
Improving Parameterization of Rain Microphysics with Disdrometer and Radar Observations (2006, background): “schemes and spectral models have received attention (e.g., Ferrier 1994; Meyers et al. 1997; Hong et al. 2004; Chen and Liu 2004).”
Next-Day Convection-Allowing WRF Model Guidance: A Second Look at 2-km versus 4-km Grid Spacing (2009, positive): “MYJ: Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (Mellor and Yamada 1982; Janjic 2002); Ferrier: (Ferrier 1994); WSM6: WRF single moment, 6-class microphysics ( Hong et al. 2004 ); BMJ: Betts-Miller-Janjic (Betts 1986; Betts and Miller 1986; Janjic 1994).”
The Roles of an Expanding Wind Field and Inertial Stability in Tropical Cyclone Secondary Eyewall Formation (2012, methodology): “The WRF Single-Moment (WSM) six-class scheme with graupel (Hong et al. 2004) is used.”
Sensitivity of Numerical Simulation of Early Rapid Intensification of Hurricane Emily (2005) to Cloud Microphysical and Planetary Boundary Layer Parameterizations (2008, methodology): “The WRF single-moment five-class (WSM5) scheme (Hong et al. 2004) is a mixed-phase scheme.”
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 (2008, methodology): “As with WSM3 and WSM5, saturation adjustment follows Dudhia (1989) and Hong et al. (1998) in separately treating ice and water saturation processes, rather than a combined saturation such as the Purdue Lin (above) and Goddard (Tao et al.”
The WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics Scheme (WSM6) (2006, positive): “1983), Ferrier (new ETA), Wrf-Single-MomentMicrophysics (WSMMPs) (Hong et al. 2004) and Thompson (Thompson et al.”
Sensitivity of WRF cloud microphysics to simulations of a severe thunderstorm event over Southeast India (2010, background): “The schemes considered are single moment six-class (WSM6) scheme (Hong et al., 2004), the Thompson Scheme (Thompson et al., 2004), the Purdue Lin Scheme (Chen and Sun, 2002) and the double moment Morrison Scheme (Morrison et al., 2009).”
The Non-hydrostatic Icosahedral Atmospheric Model: description and development (2014, methodology): “In the latest version, the schemes proposed by Kessler (1969), Lin et al. (1983), Hong et al. (2004), and Tomita (2008b) are implemented.”
Some Practical Considerations Regarding Horizontal Resolution in the First Generation of Operational Convection-Allowing NWP (2008, methodology): “Spring Experiment, hydrometeors were generated by the WRF Single-Moment 6-Class Microphysics (WSM6) microphysical parameterization ( Hong et al. 2004 ) in the WRF model.”
Four-Dimensional Variational Data Assimilation for WRF : Formulation and Preliminary Results (2009, methodology): “The ARW model used in the forecast employs the WRF Single-Moment 5-class (WSM5) microphysics scheme (Hong et al. 2004), Grell–Devenyi ensemble cumulus scheme (Grell and Devenyi 2002), and the Yonsei University (YSU) boundary layer scheme.”