Randaugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search space

By Ekin Dogus Cubuk, Barret Zoph, Jonathon Shlens, Quoc V. Le. 2019

4,297 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Recent work on automated augmentation strategies has led to state-of-the-art results in image classification and object detection. An obstacle to a large-scale adoption of these methods is that they require a separate and expensive search phase. A common way to overcome the expense of the search phase was to use a smaller proxy task. However, it was not clear if the optimized hyperparameters found on the proxy task are also optimal for the actual task. In this work, we rethink the process of designing automated augmentation strategies. We find that while previous work required a search for both magnitude and probability of each operation independently, it is sufficient to only search for a single distortion magnitude that jointly controls all operations. We hence propose a simplified search space that vastly reduces the computational expense of automated augmentation, and permits the removal of a separate proxy task.Despite the simplifications, our method achieves equal or better performance over previous automated augmentation strategies on on CIFAR-10/100, SVHN, ImageNet and COCO datasets. EfficientNet-B7, we achieve 85.0% accuracy, a 1.0% increase over baseline augmentation, a 0.6% improvement over AutoAugment on the ImageNet dataset. With EfficientNet-B8, we achieve 85.4% accuracy on ImageNet, which matches a previous result that used 3.5B extra images. On object detection, the same method as classification leads to 1.0-1.3% improvement over baseline augmentation. Code will be made available online.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Optimization & Training

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Quoc V. Le
  2. Jianfeng Gao
  3. Mohit Bansal
  4. Dacheng Tao
  5. Trevor Darrell
  6. Yoshua Bengio
  7. Sergey Levine
  8. Percy Liang

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  4. Trevor Darrell
  5. Xiaogang Wang
  6. Jitendra Malik
  7. Andrew Zisserman
  8. Alan L. Yuille

In Optimization & Training

  1. Quoc V. Le
  2. Yoshua Bengio
  3. Frank Hutter
  4. Soham De
  5. Jiashi Feng
  6. Andrew Brock
  7. Mingxing Tan
  8. Alan L. Yuille

Citations in the corpus