The political economy of organized crime: providing protection when the state does not
By Stergios Skaperdas. 2001
299 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87e0e9d9d04f62d77d97aab0bec064c8d03dd7d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Organized crime and business subsidies: Where does the money go? (2015, background): “Skaperdas (2001) formalizes this idea, while Bandiera (2003) empirically supports it by showing that the mafia was more likely to be active in towns where land was more divided; Buonanno et al. (2012) document that areas characterized by sulphur availability were also more affected by the mafia.”
- Mumbai's Development Mafias: Globalization, Organized Crime and Land Development (2008, unknown): “In some cases, the reduction or elimination of regulations, resulting in ‘so-called selfregulating markets’, can facilitate the rise or transformation of organized criminal activities (Skaperdas, 2001; Stiglitz, 2001: xv).”
- War and poverty (2010, unknown): “…actors – rebel groups, militias, paramilitary groups, warlords, gangs, mafia, drug trafficking factions, private security providers and vigilante groups – gain the monopoly over the use of violence in contested areas (Arjona 2009; Gambetta 1996; Skaperdas 2001; Volkov 2002; Weinstein 2007).”