COMPARING INCOMES WHEN NEEDS DIFFER: EQUIVALIZATION FOR THE EXTRA COSTS OF DISABILITY IN THE U.K
By A. Zaidi, T. Burchardt. 2005
320 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87b651e6898a0d59c1da9de18654978edf3b7759
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Sophie Mitra
- Aleksandra Posarac
- Brandon Vick
- Holly Sutherland
- Manudeep Bhuller
- D. Mont
- Jeanine Braithwaite
- N. Cuong
In Sociology and Political Science
- Magne Mogstad
- Sophie Mitra
- Aleksandra Posarac
- Brandon Vick
- M. Palmer
- C. Whelan
- B. Nolan
- Rolf Aaberge
Citations in the corpus
- The Distributional Impact of in Kind Public Benefits in European Countries (2009, background): “…scales covering differences in needs for the entire population exists, although a number of empirical studies focusing on particular population groups or specific situations can be found in the literature (Jones and O'Donnell, 1995; Klavus, 1999; Zaidi and Burchardt, 2005; Berloffa et al., 2006).”
- Disability and Poverty in Developing Countries: A Multidimensional Study (2013, methodology): “…evidence on extra costs of disability is rather heterogeneous given the variety of methods that have been used but overall it shows significant extra costs (Jones & O’Donnell, 1995; Mitra, Findley, & Sambamoorthi, 2009; Erb and Harris-White, 2001; Zaidi & Burchardt, 2005; Braithwaite & Mont, 2009).”
- Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, unknown): “13 E.g. Nussbaum (2002a); Burchardt (2004); Zaidi and Burchardt (2005); Terzi (2005, 2007, 2008); Wasserman (2005); Mitra (2006); Qizilbash (2011); Harnacke (2013); Robeyns (2016c).”
- Disability and poverty : a survey of World Bank poverty assessments and implications (2009, methodology): “Zaidi and Burchardt (2005) find that in the UK the sum of disability scores for an individual and partner performs best for the disability variable specification, while the natural log of income was the best specification for income.”
- Using Non-Monetary Deprivation Indicators to Analyze Poverty and Social Exclusion: Lessons from Europe?. (2010, background): “Needs also differ across households in ways that conventional equivalence scales will not capture, notably with respect to health and disability (see Zaidi and Burchardt, 2005).”
- Food Insecurity Among Households With Working-Age Adults With Disabilities (2013, unknown): “Accounting for the substantial costs of disability significantly increases the poverty rate among households with adults with disabilities because households with disabled adults need more income to cover basic living expenses (Zaidi and Burchardt, 2005).”
- Disability and Poverty: A Conceptual Review (2011, background): “The approach is commonly referred to as the standard of living approach (refer to Saunders 2007; Zaidi & Burchardt, 2005 for description).”
- Disability and Poverty in Vietnam (2011, methodology): “The Zaidi and Burchardt (2005) method of accounting for disability, applied in Braithwaite and Mont (2009), was used to estimate the extra costs of disability, with an expanded set of assets used in the asset index.”
- Does Size Matter? The Impact of Changes in Household Structure on Income Distribution in Germany (2012, background): “In addition, it is possible not only to control for size and age of household members, but also for healthrelated needs (Burchardt and Zaidi, 2005).”
- Disability, Poverty, and Schooling in Developing Countries : Results from 14 Household Surveys (2005, background): “Moreover, the presence of a person with a disability entails direct costs which result in lower standards of living (Jones and O'Donnell 1995, Zaidi and Burchardt 2005).”
- The Distributional Impact of Public Services When Needs Differ (2010, background): “…marginal budget share parameters ijβ of the utility function (2.1) 3 For example, the equivalence scales estimated by Jones and O’Donnell (1995) and Zaidi and Burchardt (2005) imply that the disable have relatively high needs, so their cash and non-cash incomes should be correspondingly adjusted…”