Redistributing income to the poor and the rich : public transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean

By Kathy A. Lindert, Emmanuel Skoufias, Joseph S. Shapiro. 2006

254 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87ae6b39f05fb973c4a31fb1475ae287c9385fa4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

DOES GOVERNMENT SPENDING AFFECT INCOME INEQUALITY? A META‐REGRESSION ANALYSIS (2017, unknown): “One possible explanation is a general tendency for expenditure in this area to become more progressive over time, which could be due to better targeting associated with the recent expansion of conditional cash transfer programmes (Lindert et al 2006, Bastagli et al 2012).”
How to Make Public Works Work : A Review of the Experiences (2009, unknown): “(Lindert et al., 2006).”
The Impact of Taxes and Social Spending on Inequality in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay: An Overview (2013, unknown): “For Brazil and Uruguay, this analysis may thus overestimate the impact 14 Lindert, Skoufias, and Shapiro (2006), for example, define as progressive any transfer that is equalizing and distinguish between those that are progressive in absolute or relative terms.”
Fiscal policy, inequality and the ethnic divide in Guatemala (2015, background): “43 For Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay, see Lustig et al. (2014). For El Salvador, see Beneke et al.”
Politics and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean (2006, background): “Recent studies of micro data suggest that even where health and education spending is progressive, it is only mildly so (Lindert et al. 2005).”
Educational Impacts and Cost-Effectiveness of Conditional Cash Transfer Programs in Developing Countries: A Meta-Analysis (2017, unknown): “administrative costs as a percent of total costs, and assuming no private costs,10 for these six programs, we follow Lindert et al. (2006) and estimate CTR as CTR Administrative Costs Administrative Costs = % 100 -% .”
Fiscal Redistribution and Income Inequality in Latin America (2008, unknown): “3 Source: Lindert et al. (2006)”
Commitment to Equity Assessment (CEQ): Estimating the Incidence of Social Spending, Subsidies and Taxes Handbook (2013, background): “, 2009) or as a government transfer especially in systems with a large subsidized component (Goñi et al., 2011; Immervoll et al., 2009; Lindert et al., 2006; Silveira et al., 2011).”
The Impact of Taxes and Social Spending on Inequality and Poverty in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Mexico, and Peru: A Synthesis of Results (2012, methodology): “…as part of market income because they are deferred income (Breceda et al., 2008; Immervoll et al., 2009) and treating them as a government transfer, especially in systems with a large subsidized component (Goñi et al., 2011; Immervoll et al., 2009; Lindert et al., 2006; Silveira et al., 2011).”