Interpreting the 'selection effect' of biodiversity on ecosystem function

By J. Fox. 2005

274 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Economics and Econometrics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87a9379be61beb8c65338ded4c83ae96ec0f4125

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. J. Bruno
2. JJ Stachowicz
3. H. Wayne Polley
4. Brian J. Wilsey
5. Barbara C. Schmid
6. S. Felten
7. J. Emmett Duffy
8. F. Bulleri

In Economics and Econometrics

1. H. Wayne Polley
2. Thorsten B. H. Reusch
3. Barbara C. Schmid
4. Zachary T. Long
5. A. Hughes
6. J. Emmett Duffy
7. A. Randall Hughes
8. J. Bruno

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. J. Bruno
2. Brian J. Wilsey
3. J. Emmett Duffy
4. H. Wayne Polley
5. JJ Stachowicz
6. Barbara C. Schmid
7. F. Bulleri
8. S. Felten

Citations in the corpus

• Complementarity among species in horizontal versus vertical rooting space (2008, methodology): “In addition, we used the tripartite partitioning method of Fox (2005) to further subdivide SE into a dominance effect (DE), strictly analogous to natural selection, and a trait-dependent complementarity effect (TDCE), attributable to species complementarity.”
• Partitioning the effects of algal species identity and richness on benthic marine primary production (2006, methodology): “We used Fox’s tripartite equations (Fox 2005) to partition the macroalgal richness effect into its three component effects: dominance, trait-dependent complementarity, and trait-independent complementarity.”
• Biodiversity, phenology and temporal niche differences between native- and novel exotic-dominated grasslands (2011, methodology): “We combined Fox’s “trait independent” and “trait dependent” complementarity measures into one complementarity measure to standardize observed relative yields at one (Fox, 2005; Hector, 2006; Wacker et al., 2009).”
• The emerging role of genetic diversity for ecosystem functioning: Estuarine macrophytes as models (2006, background): “Fox (2005) has recently expanded the approach of Loreau and Hector (2001).”
• Facilitation research in marine systems: state of the art, emerging patterns and insights for future developments (2009, background): “This statement is perfectly sound, but very few studies have formally tested these hypotheses (Cardinale, Palmer&Collins 2002; Fox 2005).”
• Above‐ground biomass is driven by mass‐ratio effects and stand structural attributes in a temperate deciduous forest (2018, background): “However, a relationship between AGB and diversity could also be due to selection effects (Fox, 2005), as higher diversity stands have an increased probability of containing a high- yielding or ecologically important species.”
• Seagrass genotypic diversity increases disturbance response via complementarity and dominance (2010, methodology): “To further differentiate among diversitymechanisms, we used standard methods (Fox 2005) to partition variation in polyculture shoot density and above-ground biomass at the end of the experiment among three mechanisms: TIC, dominance and trait-dependent complementarity.”