T1, T2 relaxation and magnetization transfer in tissue at 3T

By Greg J. Stanisz, E. Odrobina, Joseph Pun, M. Escaravage, S. Graham, M. Bronskill, R. Henkelman. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2005

1,381 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Spectroscopy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/879b8667453838e2e835b2114a634c4cfaa2dad6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

1. Mark A. Griswold
2. Robert Oostenveld
3. Essa Yacoub
4. Kamil Ugurbil
5. Arvid Lundervold

In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

1. Stephen M. Smith
2. Matthew F. Glasser
3. Kamil Ugurbil
4. Essa Yacoub
5. David C. Van Essen
6. Steven E. Petersen
7. Olaf Sporns
8. David A. Feinberg

In Spectroscopy

1. David A. Feinberg
2. Stephen M. Smith
3. Matthew F. Glasser
4. Robert Oostenveld
5. Peter B. Barker

Citations in the corpus

• Deep Learning for Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting: A New Approach for Predicting Quantitative Parameter Values from Time Series (2017, methodology): “The range of T1 and T2 values was chosen to be close to values present in the NIST phantom [7] and in human tissues, especially brain regions [8, 9, 10].”
• Magnetization Transfer Contrast and Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and Analysis of the Field-Dependent Saturation Spectrum (2017, background): “This was first discovered in vivo in the eighties (Wolff and Balaban, 1989) and studied and reviewed in detail in the following decade (Balaban and Ceckler, 1992; Henkelman et al., 1993, 2001; Pike, 1996; Stanisz et al., 1999, 2005; Wolff and Balaban, 1989).”
• The Human Connectome Project: A data acquisition perspective (2012, background): “…slow apparent diffusion constants, respectively, (assumed to be 0.8×10−3 and 1×10−4 mm2/s) with corresponding fractional pool sizes of 0.75 and 0.25 (taken from Ronen et al., 2005), with d=6ms. White matter 3T T2 was assumed to be 70 ms (Stanisz et al., 2005). stability, duty cycle, safety etc.).”
• Multi-Parametric Neuroimaging Reproducibility: A 3T Resource Study (2010, background): “Continuous wave (CW) (Henkelman et al., 2001; Stanisz et al., 2005; Wolff and Balaban, 1989) experiments rely on the large saturation effects induced by a single, long, continuous (i.”
• Estimation of Perfusion Properties with MR Fingerprinting Arterial Spin Labeling (2018, result): “Additionally, the tissue property values seen in the grey matter ROI analyses (Table 1) and in the property maps were similar to those reported in the literature [26,33].”
• The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: Methods (2013, methodology): “…associated with macromolecules and in bulk water, and is therefore different in tissues and in CSF, and has been shown to be sensitive to themyelin concentration, including both loss and regeneration (Brown et al., 2012; McCreary et al., 2009; Schmierer et al., 2004, 2007; Stanisz et al., 2005).”
• An integrative model for neuronal activity-induced signal changes for gradient and spin echo functional imaging (2009, background): “…2002; Li et al., 2006; Lu et al., 2007; Lu and van Zijl, 2005; Mitsumori et al., 2007; Peters et al., 2007; Ramani et al., 2006; Spees et al., 2001; Stanisz et al., 2005; Weigel and Hennig, 2006; Yacoub et al., 2003, 2005; Zhao et al., 2004, 2006, and references therein) have measured tissue and…”