Faculty Opinions recommendation of Brain disorders? Not really… Why network structures block reductionism in psychopathology research.

By Serge H. Ahmed. 2019

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8788e4c631b958ca55dd6e495df62ae9f01a1812

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. R. Mõttus
2. Sacha Epskamp
3. G. Costantini
4. D. Wood
5. David M. Condon
6. Tal Yarkoni
7. M. Back
8. Wendy Johnson

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Sacha Epskamp
2. David M. Condon
3. R. Mõttus
4. G. Costantini
5. William Revelle
6. M. Back
7. Matthias Ziegler
8. D. Wood

In Philosophy

1. David M. Condon
2. Aidan G. C. Wright
3. Tal Yarkoni
4. M. Back
5. Wendy Johnson
6. William Revelle
7. Sacha Epskamp

Citations in the corpus

• Descriptive, Predictive and Explanatory Personality Research: Different Goals, Different Approaches, but a Shared Need to Move beyond the Big Few Traits (2020, background): “Instead, explanations using units at more proximal levels to the phenomena we wish to explain may be more useful and appropriate (Borsboom, Cramer, & Kalis, 2019; Dennett, 2013; Hofstadter, 2007; Sperry, 1966).”