Personality and boredom proneness in the prediction of creativity and curiosity
By J. Hunter, E. Abraham, Andrew G. Hunter, L. C. Goldberg, J. Eastwood. 2016
86 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87809cfb71a3112527185688f973d92b2d078a52
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Claire M. Zedelius
- Andreas Elpidorou
- Jonathan W. Schooler
- J. Smallwood
- Jens Förster
- Roy F. Baumeister
- Zachary C. Irving
- L. Dannenberg
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Andreas Elpidorou
- Jonathan W. Schooler
- Madeleine E. Gross
- Claire M. Zedelius
- J. Smallwood
- Jens Förster
- Zachary C. Irving
- L. Dannenberg
Citations in the corpus
- The bored mind is a guiding mind: toward a regulatory theory of boredom (2018, background): “…has suggested that a state of boredom may promote creativity (Gasper & Middlewood, 2014; Harris, 2000; Mann & Cadman, 2014)—although such findings should be considered in conjunction with Hunter et al. (2016)’s study which reports that boredom as a personality trait is not predictive of creativity.”
- Cultivating an understanding of curiosity as a seed for creativity (2020, background): “Similarly, boredom proneness has been found to predict both creativity and curiosity [30], while flow states have also been suggested to connect curiosity to creativity [31].”