Public Capital and Economic Growth: Issues of Quantity, Finance, and Efficiency

By D. Aschauer. Economic development and cultural change, 2000

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring and explaining government efficiency in developing countries (2007, methodology): “Our model echoes a claim already made by Pritchett (1996), Hulten (1996) and Aschauer (2000).”
Impact of Government Expenditure on Economic Growth in Nigeria: A Disaggregated Analysis (2016, methodology): “Studies by Aschauer (2000) and tests new classical growth models’ predictions of the complementarity between public and private capital, and find public expenditure to have a positive and statistically significant impact on economic growth.”
Government Expenditure, Governance and Economic Growth (2009, methodology): “The exponential form is assumed for the 2 This is different to the Hulton (1996), Pritchett (1996) and Aschauer (2000) studies which incorporate a government effectiveness variable as proxy for government quality.”
Cities and National Economic Growth: A Reappraisal (2005, unknown): “…studies have documented the positive relationship between economic performance and local public services and infrastructures (see Arsen, 1997; Aschauer, 1993, 2000; Bidder and Smith, 1996; Crihfield and McGuire, 1997; Kessides, 1992, 1996; Lall et al., 2001; Lobo and Rantisi, 1999; Munnell,…”
Determinants of total factor productivity : a literature review (2007, result): “Based on the same data as Aschauer and Lachler (1998), Aschauer (2000) reports similar results with respect to infrastructure management but adds that the method of financing used is also crucial.”