Bee diversity and plant-pollinator interactions in fragmented landscapes
By I. Steffan‐Dewenter, Alexandra-Maria Klein, Volker Gaebele, Thomas Alfert, T. Tscharntke. 2006
135 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/876eeb64b9e7dd572df7a9ff37e95f85dd905127
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of livestock grazing on pollination on a steppe in eastern Mongolia (2008, background): “…(Olesen and Jordano, 2002), and even the robustness when structural components become extinct (Dunne et al., 2002; Memmott et al., 2004), because the actual impact of pollinator loss on pollination services depends on the degree of specialization (Bond, 1995; Steffan-Dewenter et al., 2006).”
- Landscape structure influences pollinator movements and directly affects plant reproductive success (2012, background): “Landscape structure is therefore important when considering the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions (Townsend and Levey 2005, Steffan-Dewenter et al. 2006, Van Geert et al. 2010).”
- The same, but different: pollen foraging in honeybee and bumblebee colonies (2011, background): “…behavior is thought to enable them to switch from one plant species to another more easily than specialists (Johnson and Steiner 2000; Aizen and Feinsinger 2003; Biesmeijer et al. 2006; Steffan-Dewenter et al. 2006; Devictor et al. 2008; Klein 2011, but see Bommarco et al. 2010 and Winfree 2010).”
- Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land‐use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA (2007, background): “Natural history traits such as sociality and nesting requirements can determine how bees respond to land use (Klein, Steffan-Dewenter & Tscharntke 2003a; Steffan-Dewenter et al. 2006), and variation in traits among species could lead to findings of no significant effect for the bee community as a wh”