Social Capital, Innovation, and Competitiveness

By P. Maskell. 2000

279 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/876ed7385f4a5a189157c8205d9efcb23bd199bb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Innovation management techniques and tools: a review from theory and practice (2008, background): “The contribution of knowledge to innovation is achieved in part by reducing transaction costs between firms and other actors, most notably in the areas of research and information, buying and decision-making as well as innovation policy and enforcement (Maskell, 1999).”
Innovation and Social Capital: A Cross-Country Investigation (2010, background): “In particular, social capital contributes to innovation because the high level of social capital can reduce transaction costs between actors, reduce search and information costs, bargaining costs, and decision costs (Maskell, 2001; Landry et al., 2002).”
Social Capital and the Resource-Based View of the Firm (2009, background): “Case studies of different types of firms in different industrial sectors may be one of the most fruitful ways forward in recognition of the extreme context-specific and path-dependent character of social capital (Maskell 2000, 122–123).”
Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Performance: Evidence from the Chinese Construction Industry (2019, background): “Maskell [109] shows that the close network connection, mutual trust, and reciprocity between enterprises and external organizations can positively affect organizational learning and knowledge sharing, promote innovation activities, and enhance innovation capacity.”
Strategic partnerships, social capital and innovation: accounting for social alliance innovation (2011, unknown): “information, the honoring of agreements and trust/ trustworthiness and norms of exchange for effective knowledge transfer (Maskell 2001).”
Toward a `New' Strategic Leadership of Place for the Knowledge-based Economy (2009, background): “;) and institution building (Amin, 1999; 2001; Amin and Thrift, 1995; Cooke & Morgan, 1995).”
Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development (2005, background): “This, in innovation and competitiveness (M , 2000). turn, required the examination of social capital indica- The social capital concept has begun to move from tors such as levels of informal and formal involvement urban studies, where J (1961) articulated it,1 in networks and associations, such as…”
Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size (2010, background): “In recent years, the role of social capital as a facilitator of innovation has been explored at both a micro and macro level, resulting in growing prominence within policy circles (Cooke and Wills 1999; Maskell 2000; Capello and Faggian 2005; Obstfeld 2005; Tura and Harmaakorpi 2005).”
Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory (2015, background): “…rare, since—with the exception of knowledge protected by property rights, such as patents and copyrights—they are difficult to create due to inherent asymmetry in the existing knowledge base of buyers and sellers (Arrow 1971; Grant 1996; Maskell 2000; Audretsch and Keilbach 2008; Malecki 2010).”
Three simple models of social capital and economic growth (2006, unknown): “Maskell (2000) argues that social capital refers to the values and beliefs that citizens share in their everyday dealings and which give meaning and provide design for all sorts of rules.”
A Network-based view of regional growth (2014, background): “As others have noted, inter-organisational networks of this kind generally come into being due to markets for knowledge being rare, since - with the exception of knowledge protected by property rights, such as patents and copyrights - they are difficult to create due to inherent asymmetry in the exi”
Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy (2008, background): “In order words, effective knowledge absorption is more likely to be effective through collaborative networks than it is through market transactions (Arrow, 1971; Maskell, 2000).”