On the relation between temporal variability and persistence time in animal populations

By P. Inchausti, J. Halley. 2003

134 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8764b9847d810a66dd1b761a29a0f29e3a91133c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. J. Pellet
2. E. Fleishman
3. D. Murphy
4. B. R. Schmidt

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. E. Fleishman
2. D. Murphy
3. J. Pellet
4. Richard G. Pearson
5. H. Van Dyck
6. Dirk Maes
7. R. P. Anderson
8. K. Frego

Citations in the corpus

• Citizen science monitoring demonstrates dramatic declines of monarch butterflies in western North America (2017, unknown): “The importance of environmental stochasticity in determining extinction risk is well known to theoretical ecologists (Fagan et al., 2001; Inchausti and Halley, 2003; Fagan and Holmes, 2006), but not always appreciated in conservation decisionmaking.”
• An empirical evaluation of the area and isolation paradigm of metapopulation dynamics (2007, background): “This may reflect the fact that population size and extinction probability usually are correlated negatively due to environmental and demographic stochasticity (Boyce, 1992; Inchausti and Halley, 2003).”