The use of Theravāda Buddhist practices and perspectives in mindfulness-based cognitive therapy

By Richard Gilpin. 2008

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/875f49d1f1669832fb4690eb9aef1f396c9f6997

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Ronald E. Purser
2. A. Chiesa
3. B. Atkinson
4. Ruth A. Baer
5. E. Shonin
6. William Van Gordon
7. Mark D. Griffiths

In Complementary and alternative medicine

1. Ronald E. Purser
2. A. Chiesa
3. B. Atkinson

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Ronald E. Purser
2. A. Chiesa
3. E. Shonin
4. William Van Gordon
5. Mark D. Griffiths

Citations in the corpus

• The Difficulty of Defining Mindfulness: Current Thought and Critical Issues (2013, background): “More recently, however, authors well versed in the original Buddhist literature, from which several MBIs are overtly or implicitly derived, have started raising criticism regarding the very validity of such a classification (Gilpin 2009; Lutz et al. 2008; Rapgay and Bystrisky 2009).”
• Clearing the Muddled Path of Traditional and Contemporary Mindfulness: a Response to Monteiro, Musten, and Compson (2015, background): “Gilpin (2008) made a very astute observation that while mindfulness-based interventions may encourage the self-as-observer to “be with” experience differently, this may actually reinforce a stronger sense of the agency of the self.”