ff19SB: Amino-acid specific protein backbone parameters trained against quantum mechanics energy surfaces in solution

By Chuan Tian, Koushik Kasavajhala, Kellon Belfon, Lauren E Raguette, He Huang, Angela N. Migues, John D. Bickel, Yuzhang Wang, Jorge Pincay, Qin Wu and 1 more. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2019

2,086 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have become increasingly popular in studying the motions and functions of biomolecules. The accuracy of the simulation, however, is highly determined by the molecular mechanics (MM) force field (FF), a set of functions with adjustable parameters to compute the potential energies from atomic positions. However, the overall quality of the FF, such as our previously published ff99SB and ff14SB, can be limited by assumptions that were made years ago. In the updated model presented here (ff19SB), we have significantly improved the backbone profiles for all 20 amino acids. We fit coupled φ/ψ parameters using 2D φ/ψ conformational scans for multiple amino acids, using as reference data the entire 2D quantum mechanics (QM) energy surface. We address the polarization inconsistency during dihedral parameter fitting by using both QM and MM in aqueous solution. Finally, we examine possible dependency of the backbone fitting on side chain rotamer. To extensively validate ff19SB parameters, and to compare to results using other Amber models, we have performed a total of ~5 milliseconds MD simulations in explicit solvent. Our results show that after amino-acid specific training against QM data with solvent polarization, ff19SB not only reproduces the differences in amino acid specific Protein Data Bank (PDB) Ramachandran maps better, but also shows significantly improved capability to differentiate amino acid dependent properties such as helical propensities. We also conclude that an inherent underestimation of helicity is present in ff14SB, which is (inexactly) compensated by an increase in helical content driven by the TIP3P bias toward overly compact structures. In summary, ff19SB, when combined with a more accurate water model such as OPC, should have better predictive power for modeling sequence-specific behavior, protein mutations, and also rational protein design. Of the explicit water models tested here, we recommend use of OPC with ff19SB.

Subfields: Ecology, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/873f96433ca0a29df6ff57aa95c2a6cb4222b3bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Materials Chemistry

  1. Ken A. Dill
  2. Birte Höcker
  3. Carlos Simmerling
  4. Emiliano Brini
  5. T. Croll

In Molecular Biology

  1. Ken A. Dill
  2. Emiliano Brini
  3. Steffen Schmidt
  4. Noelia Ferruz
  5. Birte Höcker
  6. Carlos Simmerling
  7. T. Croll

Citations in the corpus