Trends In The Numbers Of Red Kangaroos And Emus On Either Side Of The South Australian Dingo Fence: Evidence For Predator Regulation?

By A. Pople, G. Grigg, S. Cairns, L. Beard, P. Alexander. 2000

138 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Climate, climate change and range boundaries (2010, background): “Evidence that ‘other species’ are major determinants of distribution boundaries comes from studies of invasive species (e.g. van Riper et al., 1986; Channell & Lomolino, 2000a,b; Short & Turner, 2000) and from competition/ predation experiments (Davis et al., 1998a,b; Pople et al., 2000).”
Interactions between a Top Order Predator and Exotic Mesopredators in the Australian Rangelands (2012, background): “The removal of dingoes may thus allow herbivores [36] and smaller introduced predators to increase, depleting plant biomass and increasing predation pressure.”
Impacts of introduced deer and extinct moa on New Zealand ecosystems (2010, methodology): “The abundances of emus inside and outside the dingo fence in South Australia were estimated at ≤2.0 and ≤0.8 individuals km–2, respectively, using aerial survey (Pople et al. 2000).”
Does a top‐predator provide an endangered rodent with refuge from an invasive mesopredator? (2009, background): “…N. fuscus populations to recent rainfall events; (4) large herbivores (415 kg) which were abundant in the absence of dingoes (Caughley et al., 1980; Pople et al., 2000) may have depleted the food resources available for N. fuscus, and thus limited the response of N. fuscus populations to resource…”