SIMPSON'S PARADOX IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND IN REAL LIFE

By Eric Neufeld. 1995

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Julius von Kügelgen
2. Bernhard Schölkopf
3. Luigi Gresele
4. Gregory Peter Harmer
5. Derek Abbott
6. Francesco Locatello
7. Yoshua Bengio
8. Kenji Fukumizu

Citations in the corpus

• Simpson's Paradox in COVID-19 Case Fatality Rates: A Mediation Analysis of Age-Related Causal Effects (2020, background): “In addition, it has been observed that the paradox may occur in many other real-life contexts [34], [35], thus making its understanding relevant to the field of artificial intelligence, commonsense reasoning, and in the study of uncertain reasoning systems in general.”
• A REVIEW OF PARRONDO'S PARADOX (2002, result): “Some workers have criticized the use of the term “paradox” — however we use it in the sense of an apparent paradox and this is comparable to existing terminology, such as in “Simpson’s paradox” [21,22], “Braess paradox” [23,24] and “the renewal paradox” [25].”