Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach

By David L. Martin, Massimo Paolucci, Sheila A. McIlraith, Mark H. Burstein, Drew V. McDermott, Deborah L. McGuinness, Bijan Parsia, Terry R. Payne, M. Sabou, M. Solanki and 2 more. SWSWPC, 2004

940 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/872ca4017815372d8e702408a44e0fcdaa6a8485

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Diego Calvanese
2. Giuseppe De Giacomo
3. Marco Montali
4. Paolo Felli
5. Riccardo De Masellis
6. Babak Bagheri Hariri
7. Nigel R. Shadbolt
8. Nicholas R. Jennings

In Information Systems

1. Diego Calvanese
2. Nicholas R. Jennings
3. Nigel R. Shadbolt
4. David De Roure
5. Giuseppe De Giacomo
6. Bamshad Mobasher
7. Michael Schmidt
8. Ruhi Sarikaya

In Management Information Systems

1. Nicholas R. Jennings
2. Giuseppe De Giacomo
3. Diego Calvanese

Citations in the corpus

• Description Logic Knowledge and Action Bases (2014, background): “By the way, notice that such undecidability result also deeply questions from the computational point of view the possibility of adding (sound and complete) automated reasoning capabilities to proposals such as OWL-S (Semantic Markup for Web Services) (Martin et al., 2004).”
• The Semantic Grid: Past, Present, and Future (2005, background): “To this end, the Web Ontology Language for Services (OWL-S) [24] encodes rich semantic service descriptions [25] in a way that builds naturally upon OWL.”