Implicit Discrimination
2018
Citations in the corpus
- Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases (2016, neutral): “We assume here that this measure is analogous to reaction time in the IAT, since the shorter time implies a semantic ‘nearness’ (McDonald and Lowe, 1998; Moss et al., 1995).”
- Discrimination Against Female Migrants Wearing Headscarves (2016, unknown): “7 In this respect, the experiment was similar to the Implicit Association Test (IAT) (Bertrand et al. 2005).”
- Communities in Action: Pathways to Health Equity (2017, unknown): “The effects are greatest in situations marked by ambiguity, stress, and time constraints (Bertrand et al., 2005; Dovidio and Gaertner, 2000).”
- Teachers’ Bias Against the Mathematical Ability of Female, Black, and Hispanic Students (2019, unknown): “These findings support theories of bias and discrimination that posit that biases are apparent in low-information situations (e.g., Aigner & Cain 1977; Arrow, 1973; Bertrand et al., 2005; Bertrand & Duflo, 2016; Dovidio et al., 1998; Greenwald & Banaji, 1995; Phelps, 1972).”
- Racial bias and the validity of the Implicit Association Test (2016, unknown): “Regardless, meta-analyses seem to illustrate that these biases persist, (Bertrand et al., 2005; Greenwald et al., 2009) but should we care, and if so, to what”
- Field Experiments on Discrimination (2016, unknown): “On the other hand, Betz and Sekaquaptewa (2012) find that counterstereotypic-yet-feminine STEM role models (as signaled by characteristics such as wears make-up and pink clothes, enjoys reading fashion magazines, etc.”
- Implicit Stereotypes: Evidence from Teachers’ Gender Bias* (2019, unknown): “Implicit stereotypes can operate even without awareness or intention to harm the stigmatized-group (Nosek et al., 2002; Bertrand et al., 2005).”
- The Gender Wage Gap: Extent, Trends, and Explanations (2017, unknown): “Further insight on the persistence of discrimination is suggested by what Bertrand, Chugh, and Mullainathan (2005) have termed implicit discrimination.”
- The gender gap in bank credit access (2019, unknown): “Another explanation of potential discrimination has been proposed by Bertrand et al. (2005). discriminations is an awareness to discriminate, either for personal motivation or because belonging to a group provides relevant information.”