Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost.
By S. Crouter, P. Schneider, M. Karabulut, David Bassett. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2003
964 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Physiology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86d70387975e9c2829ee494f93adb87cbec940c0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
In Physiology
- Ulf Ekelund
- Mark H. Hansen
- Deborah Estrin
- Nick Wareham
- R. Steele
- Mani B. Srivastava
- Min Y. Mun
- M. Goto
Citations in the corpus
- Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. (2007, methodology): “Sixteen studies used the Yamax pedometer (Yamax Corp, Tokyo, Japan)—a model that has been well validated for accuracy and reliability and is frequently used in physical activity research.(41-44) The physical activity interventions evaluated in the included studies varied considerably: mean (SD) dura”
- Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes (2010, methodology): “It consists of a sensor, such as a mechanical arm, magnetic switch, or an accelerometer, and software that counts steps based on monitoring upward and downward motions [Crouter et al. 2003; Schneider et al. 2004].”
- Assessment of physical activity in youth. (2008, background): “Similar issues occur with the estimation of distance from pedometers (27), because distance is the product of stride length and frequency (101).”
- Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers (2015, result): “This may be particularly problematic at slow walking speeds, similar to findings when testing pedometers [51].”