Comparing the strength of f.c.c. and b.c.c. sub-micrometer pillars: Compression experiments and dislocation dynamics simulations
By J. Greer, Christopher R. Weinberger, Wei Cai. 2008
216 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Materials Chemistry, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86c464230811151a3a33b5e8f56cbbf6127bec0c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Materials Chemistry
In Mechanical Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
Citations in the corpus
- The role of the weakest-link mechanism in controlling the plasticity of micropillars (2009, methodology): “…Dimiduk et al., 2005; Maaß et al., 2007a; Shan et al., 2007; Frick et al., 2008), Ni-based superalloys (Uchic et al., 2004; Uchic and Dimiduk, 2005) Cu (Kiener et al., 2006), Mo (Bei et al., 2007b; Greer et al., 2008), and Au (Greer et al., 2005; Greer and Nix, 2006; Volkert ll rights reserved.”
- Micro-plasticity and recent insights from intermittent and small-scale plasticity (2017, background): “o some hundred nm. The rich intermittent plastic activity admitted by the deforming crystals has now been readily demonstrated with micro-crystal stress-strain experiments of fcc [167, 168, 169], bcc [170, 171], hcp [172], and bcp [173] lattices, whereas historically has been mainly limited to hcp l”
- Ultra-strength materials (2010, background): “Recent experiments showed that the size effects on the flow stress in nanopillars of the body-centered cubic (BCC) crystal such as Mo is less pronounced [245,246].”