Model-Driven Development: A Metamodeling Foundation
By C. Atkinson, Thomas Kühne. IEEE Software, 2003
1,037 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Software
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86bb60b810185b3571a8294b1ba77d0ea1491b72
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Gunter Saake
- Christian Kästner
- Sven Apel
- Alberto Manuel Rodrigues da Silva
- Thomas Thüm
- Ina Schaefer
- Kyoung-Dae Kim
- P. Arun Raj Kumar
In Information Systems
- Alberto Manuel Rodrigues da Silva
- Gunter Saake
- Christian Kästner
- Sven Apel
- Thomas Thüm
- Ina Schaefer
- Kyoung-Dae Kim
- P. Arun Raj Kumar
In Software
- Alberto Manuel Rodrigues da Silva
- Ina Schaefer
- Christian Kästner
- Thomas Thüm
- Sven Apel
- Gunter Saake
- Kyoung-Dae Kim
- P. Arun Raj Kumar
Citations in the corpus
- A survey on engineering approaches for self-adaptive systems (2015, neutral): “Meta-modeling is essential for model-driven development [61].”
- A Classification and Survey of Analysis Strategies for Software Product Lines (2014, methodology): “All these methods have been used successfully for analyzing single software products.”
- Model-driven engineering: A survey supported by the unified conceptual model (2015, methodology): “…(MDE) but also by related names such as model-based engineering (MBE), model-driven development (MDD), model-driven software development (MDSD) [Mellor and Balcer, 2003; Atkinson and Kühne, 2003; Stahl and Volter, 2005; Selic, 2008], or model-based testing (MBT) [Utting and Legeard, 2007].”
- Cyber–Physical Systems: A Perspective at the Centennial (2012, background): “Another important benefit is to improve productivity in the long term by supporting developers to build a software system that is less sensitive to changes in personnel, requirements, and implementation platforms [262].”
- Matters of (Meta-) Modeling (2006, background): “6 might be granted metamodel status and to fully appreciate the discussion (in section 5) on whether or not it is reasonable to associate models with language definitions, we need to make the difference between linguistic (Clt) and ontological (C o t ) instantiation [17] explicit.”