Effects of dynamic and static deficit and partial root zone drying irrigation strategies on yield, tuber sizes distribution, and water productivity of two field grown potato cultivars

By S. H. Ahmadi, M. Agharezaee, A. A. Kamgar-Haghighi, A. Sepaskhah. 2014

60 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Food Science, Plant Science, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86ae84441c9135c9515180b9b6f75e941504de8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

1. T. George
2. Suat Irmak
3. P. White
4. I. Dodd
5. M. Taylor
6. J. Lynch
7. Martin R. Broadley

In Soil Science

1. T. George
2. Suat Irmak
3. P. White

Citations in the corpus

• Irrigation Management in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Production: A Review (2021, background): “[88] however, the differences were small between treatments when the seasonal precipitation, total water supply, and seasonal crop evapotranspiration were considered [27,42,89].”
• Climate Change and Consequences for Potato Production: a Review of Tolerance to Emerging Abiotic Stress (2017, background): “Whether the physiological and agronomic effects of PRD differ substantially from applying less water to the entire rootzone (conventional deficit irrigation - DI) has been investigated in many species (Dodd 2009) including potato (Saeed et al. 2008; Shahnazari et al. 2008; Ahmadi et al. 2010; Xie et”