Coevolutionary games - A mini review

By Matjaz Perc, Attila Szolnoki. Biosyst., 2009

1,806 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Prevalence of cooperation within groups of selfish individuals is puzzling in that it contradicts with the basic premise of natural selection. Favoring players with higher fitness, the latter is key for understanding the challenges faced by cooperators when competing with defectors. Evolutionary game theory provides a competent theoretical framework for addressing the subtleties of cooperation in such situations, which are known as social dilemmas. Recent advances point towards the fact that the evolution of strategies alone may be insufficient to fully exploit the benefits offered by cooperative behavior. Indeed, while spatial structure and heterogeneity, for example, have been recognized as potent promoters of cooperation, coevolutionary rules can extend the potentials of such entities further, and even more importantly, lead to the understanding of their emergence. The introduction of coevolutionary rules to evolutionary games implies, that besides the evolution of strategies, another property may simultaneously be subject to evolution as well. Coevolutionary rules may affect the interaction network, the reproduction capability of players, their reputation, mobility or age. Here we review recent works on evolutionary games incorporating coevolutionary rules, as well as give a didactic description of potential pitfalls and misconceptions associated with the subject. In addition, we briefly outline directions for future research that we feel are promising, thereby particularly focusing on dynamical effects of coevolutionary rules on the evolution of cooperation, which are still widely open to research and thus hold promise of exciting new discoveries.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86ad59cb0ff2ec9dce7e14187c5b639bfd637f78

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. David G. Rand
  2. Matjaz Perc
  3. György Szabó
  4. Attila Szolnoki
  5. Zhen Wang
  6. Taraneh Sowlati
  7. Nazanin Shabani
  8. Long Wang

In Genetics

  1. Matjaz Perc
  2. Attila Szolnoki
  3. Zhen Wang
  4. David G. Rand
  5. György Szabó
  6. Taraneh Sowlati
  7. Nazanin Shabani
  8. Long Wang

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Matjaz Perc
  2. Attila Szolnoki
  3. Zhen Wang
  4. David G. Rand
  5. Stefano Boccaletti
  6. Martin A. Nowak
  7. Jillian J. Jordan
  8. Jesús Gómez-Gardeñes

Citations in the corpus