Trade Wars and Trade Talks with Data
By Ralph Ossa. 2014
351 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Finance
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/869b9f6aef83aaf2fa6e8ed16c41f7a5afa79853
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
In Economics and Econometrics
In Finance
Citations in the corpus
- Policy Uncertainty, Trade, and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the United States (2017, background): “Moreover, the welfare cost of trade wars in the absence of such agreements are potentially large (cf. Ossa 2014).”
- Estimates of the Trade and Welfare Effects of NAFTA (2012, neutral): “For instance, Bagwell and Staiger (1999) and Ossa (2014).”
- Policy Uncertainty, Trade and Welfare: Theory and Evidence for China and the U.S (2013, neutral): “Moreover, the welfare cost of trade wars in the absence of such agreements are potentially large—about 3.5% for the U.S. according to some quantitative exercises (Ossa, 2013).”
- Why trade matters after all (2015, background): “Caliendo and Parro (2015), Hsieh and Ossa (2012), Ossa (2014), and others work with multi-industry versions of standard trade models but also do not point out that cross-industry heterogeneity in the trade elasticities has the potential to greatly magnify the gains from trade.”
- The Welfare Effects of Transportation Infrastructure Improvements (2019, neutral): “For example, Ossa (2014) and Ossa (2015) follow a computational approach to characterize optimal tariff and tax policies in spatial frameworks, Alder et al. (2014) uses a sequential algorithm to construct an approximation of the optimal transportation network, while Allen, Arkolakis, and Takahashi…”
- Is the WTO Passé (2015, positive): “And nally, Ossa (2014) assesses the importance of pro t-shifting and terms-of-trade externalities in a calibrated quantitative model of trade agreements, and nds that together these externalities are sizable enough to account broadly for the observed magnitude of multilateral tari¤ liberalization…”
- The Return to Protectionism* (2019, neutral): “A complementary approach uses quantitative models to simulate aggregate effects of tariffs, such as the Nash equilibrium of a global trade war (Ossa 2014) or regional trade liberalizations (e.g., Caliendo and Parro 2015; Caliendo et al. 2015).4 A key challenge in the empirical literature is to…”
- Domestic Trade Frictions and Agriculture (2015, background): “The exact hat algebra strategy in Dekle, Eaton, and Kortum (2008)—used, e.g., in Parro (2013), Ossa (2014), and Caliendo and Parro (2015)—is not applicable here because of the lack of analytic characterization of trade flows. domestic trade frictions and agriculture 2725 land in constant units.”