Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in translational medicine and clinical practice
By V. Baxi, R. Edwards, Michael Montalto, Saurabh Saha. Modern Pathology, 2021
493 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Traditional pathology approaches have played an integral role in the delivery of diagnosis, semi-quantitative or qualitative assessment of protein expression, and classification of disease. Technological advances and the increased focus on precision medicine have recently paved the way for the development of digital pathology-based approaches for quantitative pathologic assessments, namely whole slide imaging and artificial intelligence (AI)–based solutions, allowing us to explore and extract information beyond human visual perception. Within the field of immuno-oncology, the application of such methodologies in drug development and translational research have created invaluable opportunities for deciphering complex pathophysiology and the discovery of novel biomarkers and drug targets. With an increasing number of treatment options available for any given disease, practitioners face the growing challenge of selecting the most appropriate treatment for each patient. The ever-increasing utilization of AI-based approaches substantially expands our understanding of the tumor microenvironment, with digital approaches to patient stratification and selection for diagnostic assays supporting the identification of the optimal treatment regimen based on patient profiles. This review provides an overview of the opportunities and limitations around implementing AI-based methods in biomarker discovery and patient selection and discusses how advances in digital pathology and AI should be considered in the current landscape of translational medicine, touching on challenges this technology may face if adopted in clinical settings. The traditional role of pathologists in delivering accurate diagnoses or assessing biomarkers for companion diagnostics may be enhanced in precision, reproducibility, and scale by AI-powered analysis tools.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8684506a5c7e208d36ffde509aad3a21abc04c04
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Faisal Mahmood
- Ming Y. Lu
- Drew F. K. Williamson
- Artem Shmatko
- N. Ghaffari Laleh
- Moritz Gerstung
- Guillaume Jaume
- Jakob Nikolas Kather
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Citations in the corpus
- Artificial intelligence in histopathology: enhancing cancer research and clinical oncology (2022, background): “This ability of AI systems to learn spatial patterns and augment existing data information, despite only having been trained on bulk genomic, transcriptomic or prognostic data, could lead to new insights into tumor clonality and cellular heterogeneity 85 .”
- Artificial intelligence for digital and computational pathology (2023, background): “Reaching the goal of precision medicine requires that increasingly different assays are carried out, each with a finer spatial and temporal resolution, thereby drastically increasing the amount of data available per patient.”