A tale of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction.

By E. Nabel, E. Braunwald. New England Journal of Medicine, 2012

986 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

European Society of Cardiology: Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2017. (2018, background): “These inequalities must in part reflect the adoption of western life-styles in many middle income countries, particularly tobacco smoking and calorie consumption, but the unavailability of facilities for contemporary investigation and interventional management of CVD also merits consideration [1, 43”
A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics (2019, background): “Almost a century later, pathologists focused on coronary arteries and thrombotic occlusions (Nabel & Braunwald, 2012).”
Update on acute coronary syndromes: the pathologists' view. (2013, background): “viously, myocardial infarction (MI) was a disease with a dire shortterm prognosis, but now the survival after MI has improved substantially, with the consequence of increasing CHD prevalence, chronic disability and treatment costs.(1) –3 Coronary heart disease is projected to remain a leading cause ”