PLOCH: a standardized method for sampling and assessing the biodiversity in ponds

By B. Oertli, D. Joye, E. Castella, R. Juge, Anthony Lehmann, J. Lachavanne. 2005

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/86627f3e18ec47565e867d4794801d57e4a88981

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. B. Oertli
2. V. Rosset
3. R. Céréghino
4. Andrew P. Hull
5. J. Lachavanne
6. Anthony Lehmann
7. Antoine Guisan
8. Jane Elith

In Ecology

1. B. Oertli
2. Andrew P. Hull
3. R. Céréghino
4. V. Rosset
5. Anthony Lehmann
6. Rosa Miracle
7. Mathieu Denoël

Citations in the corpus

• Eutrophication: are mayflies (Ephemeroptera) good bioindicators for ponds? (2008, methodology): “We will further refer to these small water bodies as ‘‘ponds’’, since most of them correspond to the criteria of the definition of a pond presented by Oertli et al. (2005a).”
• Pond conservation: from science to practice (2009, methodology): “In order to address this issue, a collaborative workshop was held in Geneva (Switzerland) in 2004 (Oertli et al., 2005a) resulting in the launch of an international forum—the ‘‘European Pond Conservation Network’’ (EPCN; www.europeanponds.org).”
• Warmer and richer? Predicting the impact of climate warming on species richness in small temperate waterbodies (2010, methodology): “Pond species richness was assessed using the PLOCH standardized method (Oertli et al., 2005), which estimates the real species richness (thereafter ‘species richness’) for five taxonomic groups: aquatic vascular plants, aquatic Gastropoda, aquatic Coleoptera (larvae and adults), Odonata adults, and ”