Integrated experimental-simulation analysis of stress and strain partitioning in multiphase alloys

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An Overview of Dual-Phase Steels: Advances in Microstructure-Oriented Processing and Micromechanically Guided Design (2015, methodology): “(75) directly compared strain data obtained by μDIC, enabling close coupling between simulation and experiments, as is shown in Figure 18.”
A virtual laboratory using high resolution crystal plasticity simulations to determine the initial yield surface for sheet metal forming operations (2016, methodology): “…et al., 2015a) or a spectral method using fast FOURIER transformation (FFT) (Lebensohn et al., 2012; Kanjarla et al., 2012; Eisenlohr et al., 2013; Tasan et al., 2014a; Shanthraj et al., 2015) based solvers have become computationally feasible for the simulation of representative volume elements…”
Dislocation activities at the martensite phase transformation interface in metastable austenitic stainless steel: An in-situ TEM study (2016, background): “In that context, it was observed that high interfacial strength contributes to the combined ductility and strength of TRIP steels, while weak interfacial bonding accounts for reduced ductility in most metal composites [25-28].”
Micromechanical behavior and thermal stability of a dual-phase α+α’ titanium alloy produced by additive manufacturing (2019, background): “order as in DP steels [42], composed of soft ferrite and hard martensite (relatively high carbon content), but stands a comparison with the mechanical contrast observed between ferrite and pearlite [43].”