Response surface methodology
By Raymond H. Myers, Douglas C. Montgomery. 1996
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Yaochu Jin
- Kwang‐Yong Kim
- Xiaoying Zhuang
- Timothy W. Simpson
- A. Afzal
- Jay D. Martin
- Shawn E. Gano
- Nam Vu-Bac
Citations in the corpus
- An evaluation of adaptive surrogate modeling based optimization with two benchmark problems (2014, methodology): “Duan et al. (1992, 1993, 1994) developed a widely used global optimization procedure, entitled the shuffled complex evolution (SCE-UA) algorithm.”
- Axial-Flow Ventilation Fan Design Through Multi-Objective Optimization to Enhance Aerodynamic Performance (2011, methodology): “In the RSA model, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) and a regression analysis including t-statistics [1] are conducted to measure the uncertainty in a set of coefficients in a polynomial.”
- Design Optimization of Internal Cooling Passage with V-shaped Ribs (2007, methodology): “Among the methods of numerical optimization, the response surface-based optimization method [ 11 ], as a global optimization method, has many advantages over the gradient-based methods [ 7 ].”
- Enzymatic extruded starch as a carbon source for the production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) by Haloferax mediterranei (2006, methodology): “Although it is of interest to find the optimal combination of extrusion conditions using response surface method [31], the moisture content of starch would be restricted by the original moisture content (about 13% in wet basis) in the native starch; the screw speed would be restricted by the choke f”
- Comparing error estimation measures for polynomial and kriging approximation of noise-free functions (2009, methodology): “An analytical estimate of GCV is available for polynomial response surface approximation ( Myers and Montgomery 1995 ).”
- Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of tapered square tubes under oblique impact loading (2012, methodology): “[45].”