CoNLL-2011 Shared Task: Modeling Unrestricted Coreference in OntoNotes

By Sameer Pradhan, Lance A. Ramshaw, Mitchell P. Marcus, Martha Palmer, Ralph M. Weischedel, Nianwen Xue. 2011

340 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Natural Language Processing

Citations in the corpus

Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution (2018, methodology): “d by Bergsma and Lin (2006)3 (“B&L”): a large list of English nouns and noun phrases with gender and 3This data was distributed in the CoNLL 2011 and 2012 shared tasks on coreference resolution. (Pradhan et al., 2011, 2012) number counts over 85GB of web news. For example, according to the resou”
Posterior calibration and exploratory analysis for natural language processing models (2015, methodology): “To prepare a POS tagging dataset, we extract Wall Street Journal articles from the English CoNLL-2011 coreference shared task dataset from Ontonotes (Pradhan et al., 2011), using the CoNLL-2011 splits for training, development and testing.”
Easy Victories and Uphill Battles in Coreference Resolution (2013, methodology): “Throughout this work, we use the datasets from the CoNLL 2011 shared task2 (Pradhan et al., 2011),”
Solving Hard Coreference Problems (2019, neutral): “0 (Pradhan et al., 2011) for evaluation.”
The KnowRef Coreference Corpus: Removing Gender and Number Cues for Difficult Pronominal Anaphora Resolution (2018, methodology): “Many resolution decisions require extensive world knowledge and understanding common points of reference (Pradhan et al., 2011).”
Prerequisite Skills for Reading Comprehension: Multi-Perspective Analysis of MCTest Datasets and Systems (2017, neutral): “For task formulation and configuration of coreference resolution, see Pradhan et al. (2011).”
Which Coreference Evaluation Metric Do You Trust? A Proposal for a Link-based Entity Aware Metric (2016, methodology): “The CoNLL-2011/2012 shared tasks (Pradhan et al., 2011; Pradhan et al., 2012) ranked participating systems using an average of three metrics, i.e. MUC , B 3 , and CEAF , following a proposal by (Denis and Baldridge, 2009a).”
Inference Protocols for Coreference Resolution (2011, methodology): “This paper describes Illinois-Coref, a coreference resolution system built on Learning Based Java (Rizzolo and Roth, 2010), that participated in the “closed” track of the CoNLL-2011 shared task (Pradhan et al., 2011).”
Poly-co: a multilayer perceptron approach for coreference detection (2011, methodology): “In this paper, we present a learning approach to coreference resolution of named entities (NE), pronouns (PRP), noun phrases (NP) in unrestricted text according to the CoNLL-2011 shared task (Pradhan et al., 2011).”
RelaxCor Participation in CoNLL Shared Task on Coreference Resolution (2011, methodology): “The CoNLL-2011 shared task (Pradhan et al., 2011) is concerned with intra-document coreference resolution in English, using Ontonotes corpora.”
A Joint Model for Entity Analysis: Coreference, Typing, and Linking (2014, background): “The ﬁrst is coreference resolution (Soon et al., 2001; Ng, 2010; Pradhan et al., 2011), which identiﬁes clusters of mentions in a document referring to the same entity.”
Addressing the Winograd Schema Challenge as a Sequence Ranking Task (2018, methodology): “A traditional coreference system and winner of the Conll 2011 Shared Task (Pradhan et al., 2011) in accuracy when considering the ensemble model, and 6 pp. when considering the average of all ﬁve initializations with best scores on the development set (accuracy for the shared task winner was taken f”
Joint Coreference Resolution and Named-Entity Linking with Multi-Pass Sieves (2013, background): “news (BN), magazine (MZ), newswire (NW), and web data (WB) (Pradhan et al., 2011).”
A system for coreference resolution for the clinical narrative (2012, methodology): “acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data, (2) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content, and (3) final approval of the version published.”
Robustness in Coreference Resolution (2020, background): “In order to have a single point of comparison, the CoNLL-2011/2012 shared tasks (Pradhan et al., 2011; 2012) start using an average of three metrics, i.”
Dynamic Knowledge-Base Alignment for Coreference Resolution (2013, methodology): “We also run our systems on the OntoNotes dataset, which was used for evaluation in CoNLL 2011 Shared Task (Pradhan et al., 2011).”
Resolving Complex Cases of Definite Pronouns: The Winograd Schema Challenge (2012, background): “Our second baseline is the Stanford resolver (Lee et al., 2011), which achieves the best performance in the CoNLL 2011 shared task (Pradhan et al., 2011).”
Towards Robust Linguistic Analysis using OntoNotes (2013, methodology): “The word sense layer was the subject of prediction in two SemEval-2007 tasks, and the coreference layer was the subject of prediction in the SemEval-2010 2 (Recasens et al., 2010), CoNLL-2011 and 2012 shared tasks (Pradhan et al., 2011; Pradhan et al., 2012).”