Control Is Not Movement

By Peter W. Culicover, Ray Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry, 2001

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8609ff11deb5711c0184467bc02e94ad9b6bdbab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. I. Landau
2. H. Sigurðsson
3. Ray Jackendoff
4. Peter W. Culicover
5. Cedric Boeckx
6. A. Sorace
7. Maria Polinsky
8. Peter Hagoort

Citations in the corpus

• The Semantic Basis of Control in English (2003, background): “Solving * This article is a companion piece to Culicover & Jackendoff 2001, which argues against Hornstein’s (1999) proposal that control is actually a species of movement.”
• Movement under Control (2004, background): “Culicover and Jackendoff (2001) previously voiced a version of the promise argument, and we have already tried to make clear why we think that argument is incorrect (see Boeckx and Hornstein 2003c:272–274).”
• The case of PRO (2008, background): “criticism, see Manzini and Roussou (2000), Culicover and Jackendoff (2001, 2006) .”
• Movement Out of Control (2003, background): “In a recent response to Hornstein 1999, Culicover and Jackendoff (2001) document a wealth of semantic nuances in the choice of controller, all of which are beyond narrow syntactic approaches.”