The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought: How metaphors create categories – quickly

141 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Metaphor in usage (2010, background): “…psycholinguists have even argued that indirect metaphor may also be resolved by categorization instead of comparison (Gentner and Bowdle 2001, 2008; Glucksberg 2001, 2008), especially when it is conventional, a characteristic which holds for an estimated 99% of all of our cases of…”
Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues (2017, methodology): “…but raises critical questions about its interpretation (cf. McGlone 2007) while aligning in various ways with other experimental work that proposes alternative models, such as Gentner and Bowdle (2008), Giora (2008), Glucksberg (2008), and Deliberate Metaphor Theory 17 Sperber and Wilson (2008).”
Metaphor Aptness and Conventionality: A Processing Fluency Account (2011, background): “…– conventionality and aptness – as candidates for explaining variation in metaphor processing fluency, the speed and ease with which people process a metaphor (e.g., Bowdle & Gentner, 2005; Clement & Gentner, 1991; Glucksberg, 2008; Glucksberg & Haught, 2006a, 2006b; Jones & Estes, 2005, 2006).”