Optimal Foraging, Predation Risk and Territory Defence

By J. Krebs, E. Grey. 2015

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85f528c68c64354e24f44eee756c58e4f1efa96e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Hayward
2. G. Kerley
3. J. O’Brien
4. M. Hofmeyr
5. W. E. Cooper Jr.
6. Rob Slotow
7. L. T. Hunter
8. G. Balme

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

1. M. Hayward
2. G. Kerley
3. W. E. Cooper Jr.
4. Rob Slotow
5. L. T. Hunter

In Sociology and Political Science

1. W. E. Cooper Jr.

Citations in the corpus

• Response and effect traits of arable weeds in agro‐ecosystems: a review of current knowledge (2017, background): “Seed predators, such as arthropods or most farmland birds, show preferences for small seeds, but with sufficient nutritive value to limit mechanical handling constraints in agreement with optimal foraging theory (Krebs, 1980).”
• TRADEOFFS BETWEEN PREDATION RISK AND FEEDING IN A LIZARD, THE BROAD-HEADED SKINK (EUMECES LATICEPS) (2000, background): “1997a), select foraging locations within habitats and patches to reduce risk (Cerri & Fraser, 1983; Holmes, 1991; Hughes & Ward, 1993; Suhonen, 1993a, b), and increase vigilance at the expense of foraging efficiency (Krebs, 1980; Lima, 1987).”
• Prey preferences of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) (Felidae: Carnivora): morphological limitations or the need to capture rapidly consumable prey before kleptoparasites arrive? (2006, background): “These species are also predation threats to cheetah, which imposes another limitation to optimality (Krebs, 1980).”