Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards

By P. Irvine, Kerry A. Emanuel, Jie He, L. Horowitz, Gabriel Vecchi, David William Keith. Nature Climate Change, 2019

202 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Solar geoengineering (SG) has the potential to restore average surface temperatures by increasing planetary albedo1–4, but this could reduce precipitation5–7. Thus, although SG might reduce globally aggregated risks, it may increase climate risks for some regions8–10. Here, using the high-resolution forecast-oriented low ocean resolution (HiFLOR) model—which resolves tropical cyclones and has an improved representation of present-day precipitation extremes11,12—alongside 12 models from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), we analyse the fraction of locations that see their local climate change exacerbated or moderated by SG. Rather than restoring temperatures, we assume that SG is applied to halve the warming produced by doubling CO2 (half-SG). In HiFLOR, half-SG offsets most of the CO2-induced increase of simulated tropical cyclone intensity. Moreover, neither temperature, water availability, extreme temperature nor extreme precipitation are exacerbated under half-SG when averaged over any Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Special Report on Extremes (SREX) region. Indeed, for both extreme precipitation and water availability, less than 0.4% of the ice-free land surface sees exacerbation. Thus, while concerns about the inequality of solar geoengineering impacts are appropriate, the quantitative extent of inequality may be overstated13.High-resolution coupled climate model simulations suggest only 0.4% of the land surface will see exacerbated hydrological risks under solar geoengineering that halves warming, indicating that geoengineering-related risks may be overstated.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85f096f61a74657763c7a4cbdd06f04e09209714

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

  1. Ben Kravitz
  2. I. Simpson
  3. J. Richter
  4. Douglas G. MacMartin
  5. John T. Fasullo
  6. A. Pendergrass
  7. Felix Creutzig
  8. M. Mills

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Yoshua Bengio
  2. Ben Kravitz
  3. I. Simpson
  4. J. Richter
  5. Douglas G. MacMartin
  6. John T. Fasullo
  7. A. Pendergrass
  8. Felix Creutzig

Citations in the corpus