Statistical problems in assessing methods of medical diagnosis, with special reference to X-ray techniques.

By J. Yerushalmy. 1947

Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

1. Emily L. Denton
2. A. Hanna
3. Inioluwa Deborah Raji
4. Walcélio L. Melo
5. Emily M. Bender
6. Amandalynne Paullada
7. Javam C. Machado
8. K. El Emam

Citations in the corpus

• AI and the Everything in the Whole Wide World Benchmark (2021, methodology): “(This is an old technique, initially used in the study of human phonetic perception [Miller and Nicely, 1955] and related to even earlier work comparing medical diagnostics when lacking access to ground truth [Yerushalmy, 1947].)”
• The prediction of faulty classes using object-oriented design metrics (2001, methodology): “[71] J. Yerushalmy: “Statistical Problems in Assessing Methods of Medical Diagnosis, with Special Reference to X-Ray Techniques”.”
• Toward Annotator Group Bias in Crowdsourcing (2021, unknown): “Thus, we use sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (1 − false positive rate) (Yerushalmy, 1947) to describe the bias of an individual annotator.”