The surface gradient method for the treatment of source terms in the shallow-water equations
By J. Zhou, D. Causon, C. Mingham, D. Ingram. 2001
607 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Computational Mechanics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85e6d3375f8c9ad88e082623f9ab0c89b60638e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
- Fengyan Shi
- James T. Kirby
- Gangfeng Ma
- Stephan T. Grilli
- Jeffrey C. Harris
- Kwok Fai Cheung
- Y. Yamazaki
- Zygmunt Kowalik
In Computational Mechanics
- Chi-Wang Shu
- Yulong Xing
- Nelida Crnjaric-Zic
- Reza Marsooli
- Weiming Wu
- Jörn Behrens
- Stefan Vater
- N. Beisiegel
Citations in the corpus
- Comparison between TVD-MacCormack and ADI-type solvers of the shallow water equations (2006, background): “[24,16]) found that the numerical imbalance could be alleviated by using the deviatoric form of SWEs, where the water level and discharge are taken as the unknown variables.”
- Source term treatment of SWEs using surface gradient upwind method (2012, methodology): “Starting from Bermudez and Vazquez-Cendon (1994) and Greenberg and Leroux (1996), the conservative property of a flow becomes a standard proof for the preservation of the numerical fluxes.”
- Numerical Simulation of the 2011 Tohoku Tsunami Based on a New Transient FEM Co-seismic Source: Comparison to Far- and Near-Field Observations (2013, methodology): “The model uses a second-order Godunov-type TVD method (ZHOU et al. 2001; LIANG and MARCHE 2009) for horizontal gridding, applied on multiple vertical levels defined by a standard bottomand surface-following r-coordinate formulation.”
- Improved implementation of the HLL approximate Riemann solver for one-dimensional open channel flows (2008, methodology): “(1) as the governing equation automatically incorporates the SGM balancing technique (Zhou et al., 2001) into the model formulation.”
- The generalized Riemann problem method for the shallow water equations with bottom topography (2006, methodology): “MIDPOINT VALUES ON CELL INTERFACES There are several methods to calculate midpoint values Un+1/2 j+1/2 such as the MUSCL-Hancock finite-volume method adopted in Reference [15].”
- Depth‐integrated, non‐hydrostatic model with grid nesting for tsunami generation, propagation, and run‐up (2010, methodology): “The finite volume method based on the conservative form of the nonlinear shallow-water equations captures flow discontinuities and conserves flow volume through a Riemann solver (e.g., Dodd, 1998; Zhou et al., 2001; Wei et al., 2006; Wu and Cheung, 2008; and George, 2010).”
- A high-order adaptive time-stepping TVD solver for Boussinesq modeling of breaking waves and coastal inundation (2012, methodology): “To eliminate errors introduced by the traditional depth gradient method (DGM), a so-called surface gradient method (SGM) proposed by Zhou et al. (2001) was adopted in the TVD based-Boussinesq models in the recent literatures.”
- High order well-balanced finite volume WENO schemes and discontinuous Galerkin methods for a class of hyperbolic systems with source terms (2006, methodology): “[38] used the surface gradient method for the treatment of the source terms.”
- A limiter-based well-balanced discontinuous Galerkin method for shallow-water flows with wetting and drying: One-dimensional case (2015, background): “For shallow water flows limiting in surface elevation generally makes sense, since this quantity is constant for the steady state at rest [1, 33].”
- Depth‐integrated, non‐hydrostatic model for wave breaking and run‐up (2009, methodology): “Their approach approximates flow discontinuities as bores or hydraulic jumps as in a finite volume model, using a Riemann solver [8–10].”
- A weighted surface-depth gradient method for the numerical integration of the 2D shallow water equations with topography (2008, methodology): “where the bed slope source term is discretized with a centered scheme [34]: 2 3”