Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy
By Philip McCann, R. Ortega-Argilés. 2011
312 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85e5c686f0a08d07352aa695638f8f2178abd46c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- R. Capello
- Max Nathan
- Ron A. Boschma
- Camilla Lenzi
- R. Camagni
- Henry G. Overman
- Pierre-Alexandre Balland
- Michaela Trippl
Citations in the corpus
- Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy (2013, background): “As McCann and Ortega-Argilés (2011) explain in an earlier paper, this version of the policy is built on Schumpeterian frameworks, regional innovation systems, and evolutionary economic geography.”
- Relatedness, complexity and local growth (2020, unknown): “…specialisation policies (Foray et al., 2009, 2011), which encourage regions to upgrade their economic structure “by building on their existing capabilities” (Balland et al., 2018a) and which are a core component of the reformed EU Cohesion policy (Barca, 2009; McCann and Ortega-Argilés, 2015).”
- The territorial dynamics of innovation in China and India (2012, unknown): “…are taken into account, the R&D spillovers become negative and significant, generating what is known as the ‘Krugman shadow effect’ (McCann and Ortega-Argilés, 2011), that is the agglomeration of innovation in core areas leads to ever greater concentration of innovation by promoting further…”
- Constructing Regional Advantage and Smart Specialisation: Comparison of Two European Policy Concepts (2014, methodology): “To assess whether related industries are actually connected in a region would also enrich the concept of connectivity proposed by McCann and Ortega-Argiles (2011).”
- Spatial Heterogeneity in Knowledge, Innovation, and Economic Growth Nexus: Conceptual Reflections and Empirical Evidence (2014, background): “In normative terms, these results are closely in line with the current debate on smart specialization (Foray, 2009; McCann and Ortega-Argilés, 2011; Barca, McCann, and Rodrı́guez-Pose, 2012; Camagni and Capello, 2013) calling for ad hoc, thematically/regionally focused innovation policies.”
- Regional Innovation Patterns and the EU Regional Policy Reform: Toward Smart Innovation Policies (2013, background): “The two key concepts of ‘embeddedness’ and ‘connectedness’ – put forward in the recent debate on SmSp – are starting concepts around which smart innovation policies could be designed: policies have to be embedded in the local reality, in local assets and strategic design capabilities, and have to gu”