Weighing the Costs and Benefits of State Renewables Portfolio Standards in the United States: A Comparative Analysis of State-Level Policy Impact Projections

By C. Chen. 2009

114 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85e0a3ed1e407a0b2f6c3312adcf5b8b72e94036

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. G. Barbose
2. R. Wiser
3. M. Bolinger
4. D. Millstein
5. Anil Markandya
6. Alberto Longo

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. G. Barbose
2. A. Mills
3. R. Wiser
4. M. Bolinger
5. D. Millstein

In Sociology and Political Science

1. G. Barbose
2. R. Wiser
3. M. Bolinger
4. D. Millstein
5. Alberto Longo
6. Anil Markandya

Citations in the corpus

• A retrospective analysis of benefits and impacts of U.S. renewable portfolio standards (2016, result): “…assessments of RPS outcomes, and the previous study in this report series (Heeter et al. 2014) highlighted the widely varying scopes and methods of those state-specific analyses, which complicates comparisons.5 Chen et al. (2009), meanwhile, summarize state-level forecasts of RPS outcomes.”