Background shifts affect explanatory style: how a pragmatic theory of explanation accounts for background effects in the generation of explanations
By Seth Chin-Parker, Alexandra Bradner. 2010
22 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Decision Sciences, History and Philosophy of Science
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Tim Miller
- Seth Chin-Parker
- Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
- Julie A Cantelon
- Tania Lombrozo
- Chenhao Tan
- Robert R. Hoffman
- Gary Klein
In General Decision Sciences
In History and Philosophy of Science
- Tim Miller
- Tania Lombrozo
- Seth Chin-Parker
- Daniel A. Wilkenfeld
- Julie A Cantelon
- Gary Klein
- Robert R. Hoffman
- Philip N. Johnson-Laird
Citations in the corpus
- Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI (2019, neutral): “Key theoretical, review, and empirical articles include: (Byrne, 1992; Chin-Parker and Bradner, 2010; Craik, 1967; Ebel, 1974; Fernbach, Sloman, Louis, and Shube, 2012; Geldard, 1939; George, 1953; Giffin, Wilkenfeld and Lombrozo, 2017; Gopnik, 2000; Kass and Leake, 1987; Keil, 2006; Keil,…”
- Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences (2017, background): “Cognitive process — The process of abductive inference for ‘filling the gaps’ [27] to determine an explanation for a given event, called the explanandum, in which the causes for the event are identified, perhaps in relation to a particular counterfactual cases, and a subset of these causes is select”
- Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation-Based Category Learning (2017, background): “We propose that this initial stage takes place via a contrastive process—the specification occurs by establishing a contrast class that represents the possible, but non-occurring, alternatives to the topic of the explanation (Chin-Parker & Bradner, 2010; Schaffer, 2005; Sinnott-Armstrong, 2008).”
- Explanation and Abductive Inference (2012, background): “…occurs comes from the observation that explanations are typically contrastive: They account for one state of affairs in contrast to another (see e.g., Chin-Parker & Bradner, 2010; Garfinkel, 1990; Hart & Honore, 1985; Hilton, 1996; Hilton & Slugoski, 1986; Mackie, 1980; van Fraassen, 1980).”
- Goals Affect the Perceived Quality of Explanations (2015, background): “Chin-Parker and Bradner (2010) also found that the frequency with which participants generated mechanistic and teleological explanations was influenced by changing background conditions, but they did not vary participants’ goals.”