Existence of log canonical closures
By Christopher D. Hacon. 2011
199 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Let f:X→U be a projective morphism of normal varieties and (X,Δ) a dlt pair. We prove that if there is an open set U0⊂U, such that (X,Δ)×UU0 has a good minimal model over U0 and the images of all the non-klt centers intersect U0, then (X,Δ) has a good minimal model over U. As consequences we show the existence of log canonical compactifications for open log canonical pairs, and the fact that the moduli functor of stable schemes satisfies the valuative criterion for properness.
Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85dd4b3b45bc9afa6d13fad72d9b054fdbd1e6cb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geometry and Topology
- Chenyang Xu
- C. Birkar
- Christopher D. Hacon
- Yuri Prokhorov
- Stefano Filipazzi
- O. Fujino
- J. McKernan
- Constantin Shramov
In Mathematical Physics
- Chenyang Xu
- Christopher D. Hacon
- Stefano Filipazzi
- O. Fujino
- J. McKernan
- Yuri Prokhorov
- Constantin Shramov
- C. Birkar
Citations in the corpus
- Stability of valuations and Kollár components (2016, unknown): “nt of Z 0 except X 0. We also note that ˚ 1 1 S0+ (1 )H+ (0) 1 D + H0+ (1 2) is horizontal over C. We run an MMP of (Z;˚ 1 1 S0+ (1 )H+ (0) 1 D + H0+ (1 2)) over Xwith the scaling of H0. By [HX13], we can get a relative minimal model f: Z99K W. Since K W+f ˚ 1(S0+(1 1)H+(0) 1D)+ 1H0+(1 2) ˘ Q f ”
- ACC for log canonical thresholds (2012, methodology): “In this case [7] or by Theorem 1.6 of [16], we may replace Y by a log terminal model of ( Y, E + Γ − εT ) over X , gaining the fact that − T is nef over X , at the expense of temporarily losing the property that ( Y, Γ + E ) is divisorially log terminal, whilst preserving the condition that K Y + E…”
- Jordan property for Cremona groups (2012, background): “Taking a log canonical closure ( ¯ V , ¯ D ) of the log pair ( V,D ) as in [14, Corollary 1.2], we see that Z is still a minimal center of non-klt singularities of the new pair ( ¯ V , ¯ D ) , and all other centers of non-klt singularities of ( ¯ V , ¯ D ) are disjoint from Z .”
- The dual complex of Calabi–Yau pairs (2015, unknown): “Then, by [1,18], the (X, =1)-MMP terminates with a Fano-contraction q : Xr → Z .”
- Semipositivity theorems for moduli problems (2012, background): “As the culmination of the works of several authors (see, for example, [Ale94], [Ale96], [AM04], [HMX14], [HX13], [KM97], [Kol08], [Kol16], [KSB88]), we have Corollary 1.4.”
- On a generalized canonical bundle formula and generalized adjunction (2018, background): “Then, by [24], we may assume that Z is projective.”
- The essential skeleton of a degeneration of algebraic varieties (2013, background): “dimension n= dim(XK). Then Sk(XK) is an n-dimensional closed pseudo-manifold. Proof. By running MMP for Y over C, we know that Xhas a good minimal dlt model X with reduced special fiber (see [Fu11] or [HX13]). Then one sees as in the proof of Theorem 4.1.4 that KX is trivial over C. Our assumption on”