Phonetically Based Phonology: A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness

By R. Wright. 2004

315 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85d2976fed29cdc03a16c73585c7e09950b4bd33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Nicholas Evans
2. Martin P. Cooke
3. María Luisa García Lecumberri
4. Stephen C. Levinson
5. Anne Cutler
6. Sotaro Kita
7. Paula Rubio-Fernández
8. Marianne Gullberg

In Language and Linguistics

1. Nicholas Evans
2. Stephen C. Levinson
3. Martin P. Cooke
4. María Luisa García Lecumberri
5. Anne Cutler
6. Paula Rubio-Fernández
7. Marianne Gullberg
8. Morten H. Christiansen

Citations in the corpus

• The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. (2009, background): “Markedness (i.e., well-formedness) hierarchies, such as sonority, could vary in detail due to both predictable grammatical processes (e.g., conflation; de Lacy 2006) and variation in finegrained phonetic properties that could inform their inference (Hayes & Steriade 2004).”
• Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review (2010, background): “Many studies agree that sibilance is particularly robust in noise (Miller and Nicely 1955; Wang and Bilger, 1973; Wright, 2004; Cooke et al. this issue).”