An Evaluation of Spatial Autocorrelation and Heterogeneity in the Residuals of Six Regression Models
By Lianjun Zhang, Zhihai Ma, Luo Guo. Forestry sciences, 2009
77 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Spatial effects include spatial autocorrelation and heterogeneity. Ignoring spatial effects in a modeling process causes misleading significance tests and suboptimal model prediction. In this study, we used three forest plots with different spatial patterns of tree locations (i.e., clustered, random, and regular patterns) to investigate the spatial distributions and heterogeneity in the model residuals from six regression models with the ordinary least squares (OLS) as the benchmark. Our results revealed that when significant spatial autocorrelations and variations existed in the relationship between tree height and diameter, as in the softwood plot (clustered) and hardwood plot (random), OLS was not appropriate for modeling the relationship between tree variables. Spatial regression models (i.e., spatial lag and spatial error models) were effective for accounting for spatial autocorrelation in the model residuals, but they were insufficient to deal with the problem of spatial heterogeneity. It was evident that the model residuals in both spatial lag and spatial error models had a similar pattern and magnitudes of spatial heterogeneity at spatial scales different from those of the OLS model. In contrast, the linear mixed model and geographically weighted regression incorporated the spatial dependence and variation into modeling processes, and consequently, fitted the data better and predicted the response variable more accurately. The model residuals from both the linear mixed model and geographically weighted regression had desirable spatial distributions, meaning fewer clusters of similar or dissimilar model residuals over space.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85b11fd768aeba1a3267203e114b8b3b765d977f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Residual spatial autocorrelation in macroecological and biogeographical modeling: a review (2019, methodology): “2004 Journal of Vegetation Science Elaborate SAC-SP habitat distribution 48 Zhang et al. 2009 Forest Science Elaborate Species model comparison-SAC 49 Gwenzi et al. 2017 IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing Elaborate SAC and plant Biomass 50 Roth et al.…”