Ecosystem disservices research: A review of the state of the art with a focus on cities

390 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Non-native species in urban environments: patterns, processes, impacts and challenges (2017, background): “…et al. 2015), novel ecosystems (Hobbs et al. 2014), social–ecological systems (Hui and Richardson 2017), human–wildlife conflicts (Dickman 2010), urban green infrastructure (Tzoulas et al. 2007), urban planning and design (Ahern 2013), and ecosystem services/disservices (von Dohren and Haase 2015).”
The Role of Urban Agriculture as a Nature-Based Solution: A Review for Developing a Systemic Assessment Framework (2018, background): “3), there is the need not to romanticize UPA but to reflect also its potential risks and negative impacts [14] such as those related to ecosystem disservices [178].”
Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas (2015, background): “There is also a growing literature on ‘ecosystem disservices’ [59 ,60 ,61], which are important to include in the future analyses, but so far there are limited quantifications of these due to methodological challenges.”